|
|
"Windows Defender Vs Third Party Security Package Who Won?"
By David Richards | Published:18/03/2007
With the launch of the new windows Vista operating system the burning question for many is whether Microsoft's new Defender software is up to scratch and whether one really needs a third party Internet Security Suite. In an effort to determine this first hand we pitted the highly popular Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security 2007 suite which we had just got in for review up against Windows Defender. We did this by visiting several questionable sites that we knew downloaded dangerous cookies. We also loaded a known low level virus. In addition we made sure that both protection applications had the latest upgrades loaded.
The results after 90 minutes of testing were quite astounding. Firstly Windows Defender came back showing the Windows Vista system was totally clean. The message said that "No unwanted or harmful soft detected". The Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security 2007 suite on the other hand found 32 questionable files including the ones we had deliberately loaded. 
Click to enlarge |
So the answer is crystal clear one does need third party protection software like the Trend Micro offering which we used for this exercise.
|
By Bruce |
Best package around
Pros: Thorough, Unintrusive, Very fast
Cons: None
Compared to Symantec it is orders of magnitude faster. It is just as intrusive as it needs to be and no more. And you get 3 licenses for the price of one. |
|
|
Find the Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security 2007 Version on DigitalHome.com.au
>> Search
|
Link this review:
|
|
| Smarthouse gives you the low-down on all that HD TV has to offer - the best TVs both LCD and Plasma, plus peripherals. We also cover great ski gear and awesome in-car entertainment, as well as all the usual features… |
|
|
|
