A 4SquareMedia Website
SmartHouse | SmartOffice | DigitalHome     
 
 
     THE LIFESTYLE TECHNOLOGY GUIDE    
 
sections
Product Reviews
Services
Subscribe
Top 10 Articles
1. Blu-Ray Dead In 5 Years Says Samsung
2. Apple Store Chadstone To Open Soon
3. Toy-Like Walkman Phone Quite The Performer
4. New Clipsal C-Bus Program For Control Systems
5. Pioneer Set To Transform Itself With New Brand Campaign
6. Chrome Grabs 1% Of Browser Market In 24hrs
7. Best Of The Best Winners Announced By CEDIA
8. Laptop Smartarse Dragged Off Qantas Plane
9. CEDIA US Opens Complete With Sneak Prieviews
10. Microsoft AD Slammed Bizarre And Stupid
 
 

IPODS & PORTABLE PLAYERS / PORTABLE DEVICE ISSUES

  Do You Want To Sue Apple?

By David Richards | Tuesday | 08/11/2005

US lawyers are shopping for Australians who want to take legal action against Apple for defective Nanos.

Seattle-based lawyers in the USA Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro (HBSS) are trying to mount a global class-action lawsuit against Apple following the iPod Nano 'scratch scandal'.

Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro (HBSS) said that they would represent anyone including Australians. Yesterday they filed a parallel complaint from UK resident Ben Jennings. The lawsuit was filed with the US District Court for Northern California. Jennings claims he bought a Nano in September but despite treating the screen "extremely cautiously" it became "so marred with scratches it became hard to read", according to HBSS. How long did it this take? Within a week, the plaintiff claims.

"If I had known the truth about the problem, I never would have purchased a Nano," said Jennings via his legal representative.

The "truth" in this matter, as stated in the original HBSS complaint, filed with the US District Court in San Jose, is that the Nano is endemically faulty thanks to a "defective design", and that Apple knew as much but chose to release the product anyway and hide the fault from consumers. The fault, it's claimed, allows the screen to become badly scratched even through "normal" use. So, at least, allege the plaintiffs' HBSS is representing, who are seeking recompense. HBSS said Jennings, who is not a US resident, can nonetheless seek restitution through the US court because Apple is headquartered there. The lawfirm also said it had filed a complaint on behalf of a Mexico resident, though it did not provide further details. They also said that "We will listen to any national who has a complaint irrelivent of where they live as Aplle can be sued in the USA".

 

Print this article
Email this story to a friend
Link this story:

Link this page to delicious Link this page to Digg Link this page to Furlit Link this page to News Vine Link this page to Reddit Link this page to Spurl Link this page to Yahoo My Web RSS this section

 

 
LATEST REVIEWS
MORE
Review: Surround Sound Minus The Extra Speakers
If you live in a flat and don’t have space for a 5.1 speaker system...
CD Review: Martha Wainwright: I Know You're Married, But I've Got Feelings Too
Compared to her flamboyant big brother Rufus, Martha Wainwright always seemed the quiet and demure...
DVD Review: Apocalypto
Set in pre-Columbus Central America, Apocalypto is another Mel Gibson extravaganza where his penchant for...




SMARTHOUSE NEWSLETTER

Get the latest news
Subscribe today for your daily news of consumer electronic news...




 
SMARTHOUSE 2008 | Legal | Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions

Copyright 2006 Smarthouse Magazine Online